Defining corporal punishment

Corporal punishment refers to the use of physical force with the intent of causing pain, but not injury, as a means of correcting or controlling a child's behaviour. The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child defines it as any punishment that involves physical force and is intended to cause some degree of pain or discomfort, regardless of its severity. This disciplinary practice has been widely debated, with growing evidence highlighting its potential harm and ineffectiveness.

Insights from literature

Two decades ago, physical punishment of children was widely accepted worldwide as a legitimate means of enforcing behavioural compliance. It was largely viewed as distinct from child abuse. However, this perception has shifted significantly as research has increasingly linked "normative" physical punishment to various negative long-term outcomes, including aggression, delinquency, and even spousal assault in adulthood.

A landmark study conducted in 1997, involving a sample of 807 children, controlled for factors such as child antisocial behaviour, family socioeconomic status, and home environment. The study found that physical punishment administered between the ages of six and nine was predictive of increased antisocial behaviour two years later. Subsequent research, even when accounting for different variables, consistently revealed similar findings.

Children who experience corporal punishment are more likely to adopt aggressive conflict resolution strategies when interacting with siblings and peers. Furthermore, research indicates that parents who use physical punishment often experienced it themselves during childhood, highlighting the cyclical nature of this disciplinary approach. Social cognitive theory supports this, emphasising the role of observational learning in shaping behaviour. When children witness adults resorting to physical punishment, they internalise it as an acceptable response to conflict and misbehaviour.

Beyond behavioural outcomes, corporal punishment has been associated with various mental health challenges, including depression, anxiety, substance use, and broader psychological maladjustment. Some studies suggest that these negative effects may stem from disruptions in parent-child attachment, elevated cortisol levels due to stress, or chemical imbalances in the brain's regulatory mechanisms. Additionally, research links corporal punishment to slower cognitive development, with neuroimaging studies indicating that physical punishment may reduce grey matter volume in brain regions critical to cognitive performance, as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III).

In response to the overwhelming body of evidence against physical punishment, the Joint Statement on Physical Punishment underscores its risks and argues for the adoption of alternative, positive disciplinary methods. Experts advocate for discipline that is rooted in clear, age-appropriate expectations communicated within a trusting and safe environment. The emphasis is placed on non-violent strategies that encourage healthy child development and behavioural regulation.

Current legislation in South Africa

South Africa has taken a firm legal stance against corporal punishment. In September 2019, the Constitutional Court ruled that enforcing corporal punishment within the home is unconstitutional. Historically, parents could justify physical discipline under the notion of "reasonable chastisement," but the court determined that such measures unjustifiably violated a child's right to human dignity and freedom from violence.

The ruling emphasised that physical punishment is neither necessary nor effective in promoting discipline. Instead, it acknowledged the availability of alternative, non-violent methods that serve the child’s best interests. This landmark decision aligns with global trends advocating for the protection of children’s rights and the promotion of positive, non-violent parenting strategies.

Conclusion

The understanding of corporal punishment has evolved significantly, shifting from a widely accepted disciplinary tool to a practice recognised for its harmful effects. Extensive research underscores its links to aggression, mental health issues, and impaired cognitive development. In light of this evidence, South Africa’s legal framework now prohibits corporal punishment within the home, reinforcing a commitment to children’s rights and well-being.

Moving forward, parents and caregivers are encouraged to embrace alternative, constructive disciplinary methods that foster positive child development while upholding the dignity and safety of children.

Bibliography

• 18 September 2019, Freedom of Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others, Constitutional Court, ZACC34; confirming 19 October 2017, YG v. The State, High Court of Gauteng Local Division, Case No. A263/2016 2 R v Janke and Jank
• Bussman K-D, Erthal C, Schroth A. Effects of banning corporal punishment in europe: a five-nation comparison. In: Durrant JE, Smith AB, editors. Global pathways to abolishing physical punishment: realising children’s rights. New York (NY): Routledge; 2011. p. 299–322
• Canadian Paediatric Society Guiding your child with positive discipline. Ottawa (ON): The Society; 2012.
• Day DE, Roberts M. An analysis of the physical punishment component of a parent training program. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1983;11:141–52 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Durrant JE, Smith AB. Global pathways to abolishing physical punishment: Realising children’s rights. New York (NY): Routledge; 2011
• Gage & Silvestre, 2010. Maternal violence, victimisation, and child physical punishment in Peru. Child Abuse & Neglect Volume 34, Issue 7, July 2010, Pages 523-533
• Gershoff ET. Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2002;128:539–79
• Global initiative to end all corporal punishment of children. Available: www.endcorporalpunishment.org
• Grogan-Kaylor A. Corporal punishment and the growth trajectory of children’s antisocial behavior. Child Maltreat 2005;10:283–92 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Gunnoe ML, Mariner CL. Toward a developmental–contextual model of the effects of parental spanking on children’s aggression. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:768–75
• McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D’Alessio AC, et al. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci 2009;12:342–8
• Mulvaney MK, Mebert CJ. Parental corporal punishment predicts behavior problems in early childhood. J Fam Psychol 2007; 21:389–97
• Sheu Y-S, Polcan A, Anderson CM, et al. Harsh corporal punishment is associated with increased T2 relaxation time in dopamine-rich regions. Neuroimage 2010;53:412–9
• Simons & Wurtele, 2010. Relationships between parents' use of corporal punishment and their children's endorsement of spanking and hitting other children. September 2010: Child Abuse & Neglect 34(9):639-46
• Slade EP, Wissow LS. Spanking in early childhood and later behaviour problems: a prospective study of infants and young toddlers. Pediatrics 2004;113:1321–30
• Straus MA. Discipline and deviance: physical punishment of children and violence and other crime in adulthood. Soc Probl 1991; 38:133–54 [Google Scholar]
• Straus MA, Paschall MJ. Corporal punishment by mothers and development of children’s cognitive ability: a longitudinal study of two nationally representative age cohorts. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2000;18:459–83
• Straus MA, Sugarman DB, Giles-Sims J. Spanking by parents and subsequent antisocial behavior of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:761–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Taylor CA, Manganello JA, Lee SJ, et al. Mothers’ spanking of 3-year-old children and subsequent risk of children’s aggressive behavior. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1087–1065
• Tomoda A, Suzuki H, Rabi K, et al. Reduced prefrontal cortical gray matter volume in young adults exposed to harsh corporal punishment. Neuroimage 2009;47:T66–71
• Turner HA, Muller PA. Long-term effects of child corporal punishment on depressive symptoms in young adults: potential moderators and mediators. J Fam Issues 2004;25:761–82